paradiselost
- Beiträge
- 938
Schon echt lustig was manche hier von sich geben.... von wegen 8 FPS nur mit Batteriegriff nerven...als Hobby-Knipser...alles klar... 
Die D700 ist nach wie vor eine Top DSLR, und ISO6400 absolut brauchbar....Thom Hogan hat völlig recht, wenn er in seinem neuen Editional (be)schreibt, ob 4 oder 12 FPS....völlig egal...die wenigsten machen Sports Shots....
Zitate:"Does it make a difference whether I can shoot at ISO 6400 or 12,800 in getting the same noise level? No. Not to me it doesn't. First, I'm not shooting at those levels except under exceptional conditions where there is no other choice. I'm already at least three stops better than I was with film, and I managed that kind of shooting in some pretty tough conditions without ISO 102,400. Or even ISO 3200. Even where a camera is indeed a stop better (and I doubt that these pro cameras are that far apart), at high ISO values I'm having to apply noise reduction anyway, and with care the difference is mostly moot"
"Do I need 1 or 2 more fps? Absolutely not! In fact, I'd argue that there's evidence that these gains tend to come at the expense of autofocus performance more often than not. For what? At 1/500 second, which is usually the minimum of where I'm at when I'm shooting any kind of burst, the difference between "getting the shot" at 4 fps versus 12 fps boils down to not a lot of advantage: 1 in 125 of a chance of getting "the shot" versus 1 in 42. Meanwhile, if I actually use my senses to carefully time a single shot, I find my odds go up significantly, to something like 1 in 3 or 1 in 4. Which do you think I prefer?"
"Meantime, the Canon and Nikon pro shooters are doing just that: shooting. All they need to know is whether the new stuff gives them any advantage in actual use than the stuff they're currently using. The answer is almost certainly yes in both camps. D4 users, for example, get more pixels and more reliable autofocus. Who would balk at that? Not me."
Die meisten Leute und -Typen sind dermaßen in ihre Technik vertieft, das sie vor lauter Fachsimpeln das Fotografieren vergessen.... Just my 2 Cents....
Die D700 ist nach wie vor eine Top DSLR, und ISO6400 absolut brauchbar....Thom Hogan hat völlig recht, wenn er in seinem neuen Editional (be)schreibt, ob 4 oder 12 FPS....völlig egal...die wenigsten machen Sports Shots....Zitate:"Does it make a difference whether I can shoot at ISO 6400 or 12,800 in getting the same noise level? No. Not to me it doesn't. First, I'm not shooting at those levels except under exceptional conditions where there is no other choice. I'm already at least three stops better than I was with film, and I managed that kind of shooting in some pretty tough conditions without ISO 102,400. Or even ISO 3200. Even where a camera is indeed a stop better (and I doubt that these pro cameras are that far apart), at high ISO values I'm having to apply noise reduction anyway, and with care the difference is mostly moot"
"Do I need 1 or 2 more fps? Absolutely not! In fact, I'd argue that there's evidence that these gains tend to come at the expense of autofocus performance more often than not. For what? At 1/500 second, which is usually the minimum of where I'm at when I'm shooting any kind of burst, the difference between "getting the shot" at 4 fps versus 12 fps boils down to not a lot of advantage: 1 in 125 of a chance of getting "the shot" versus 1 in 42. Meanwhile, if I actually use my senses to carefully time a single shot, I find my odds go up significantly, to something like 1 in 3 or 1 in 4. Which do you think I prefer?"
"Meantime, the Canon and Nikon pro shooters are doing just that: shooting. All they need to know is whether the new stuff gives them any advantage in actual use than the stuff they're currently using. The answer is almost certainly yes in both camps. D4 users, for example, get more pixels and more reliable autofocus. Who would balk at that? Not me."
Die meisten Leute und -Typen sind dermaßen in ihre Technik vertieft, das sie vor lauter Fachsimpeln das Fotografieren vergessen....
Just my 2 Cents....
